<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>苹果手表争议 &#8211; 52iwatch.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://52iwatch.com/tag/%e8%8b%b9%e6%9e%9c%e6%89%8b%e8%a1%a8%e4%ba%89%e8%ae%ae/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://52iwatch.com</link>
	<description>关注穿戴设备，关注iwatch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 14:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>zh-Hans</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Apple Watch血氧功能种族偏见诉讼：苹果胜诉，但争议未停</title>
		<link>https://52iwatch.com/2023/08/23/%e7%be%8e%e5%9b%bd%e6%b3%95%e9%99%a2%e6%8b%92%e7%bb%9dapple-watch-%e8%a1%80%e6%b0%a7%e5%8a%9f%e8%83%bd%e7%a7%8d%e6%97%8f%e5%81%8f%e8%a7%81%e9%9b%86%e4%bd%93%e8%af%89%e8%ae%bc%e6%a1%88/</link>
					<comments>https://52iwatch.com/2023/08/23/%e7%be%8e%e5%9b%bd%e6%b3%95%e9%99%a2%e6%8b%92%e7%bb%9dapple-watch-%e8%a1%80%e6%b0%a7%e5%8a%9f%e8%83%bd%e7%a7%8d%e6%97%8f%e5%81%8f%e8%a7%81%e9%9b%86%e4%bd%93%e8%af%89%e8%ae%bc%e6%a1%88/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[52iwatch_com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 06:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[健康监测]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[苹果手表争议]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[血氧监测]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://52iwatch.com/?p=995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>美国法院驳回了针对Apple Watch血氧功能的种族偏见集体诉讼。本文分析诉讼背景、苹果的抗辩理由，以及血氧传感器在不同肤色用户中的准确性问题。</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT之家 8 月 22 日消息，苹果公司于去年年底遭到集体诉讼，指控理由是 Apple Watch 中的血氧传感器对深色肤色的佩戴者存在“种族偏见”。<strong>美国地方法官于本周一驳回了这起集体诉讼。</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://52iwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/clip_image002.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="834" height="735" title="clip_image002" style="display: inline; background-image: none;" alt="clip_image002" src="https://52iwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/clip_image002_thumb.jpg" border="0"></a></p>
<p>IT之家注：苹果在 Apple Watch Series 6 及后续手表机型上，引入了血氧检测功能，可以测量显示从肺部携带到身体其他部位的氧气百分比，从而让佩戴者更直观地了解和掌控自己的健康情况。</p>
<p>Apple Watch 的背面需要接触皮肤，以便血氧应用程序测量出准确的读数。佩戴 Apple Watch 时不要太紧或太松，留有皮肤呼吸的空间，有助于确保血氧测量成功。</p>
<p>原告亚历克斯・莫拉莱斯（Alex Morales）认为，苹果在宣传 Apple Watch 中存在误导行为，<strong>让其错误认为血氧应用程序可以</strong><strong>“</strong><strong>不考虑肤色</strong><strong>”</strong><strong>测量血氧水平。</strong></p>
<p>他在今年 5 月修正了诉讼文件，引用了过去几十年的相关报告，表示类似的脉搏血氧仪，<strong>在检测非白人用户时存在</strong><strong>“</strong><strong>明显不准确</strong><strong>”</strong><strong>。</strong></p>
<p>美国曼哈顿地区法官杰德・拉科夫（Jed Rakoff）目前以“偏见”为由，<strong>驳回了这项拟议中的集体诉讼，表示不接受这项集体诉讼。</strong></p>

<p><img src="https://52iwatch.com/postviews/995.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://52iwatch.com/2023/08/23/%e7%be%8e%e5%9b%bd%e6%b3%95%e9%99%a2%e6%8b%92%e7%bb%9dapple-watch-%e8%a1%80%e6%b0%a7%e5%8a%9f%e8%83%bd%e7%a7%8d%e6%97%8f%e5%81%8f%e8%a7%81%e9%9b%86%e4%bd%93%e8%af%89%e8%ae%bc%e6%a1%88/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
